Tobias Reijngoud writes me that he briefly studied lichens ten years ago during his years at Utrecht University (
Fysische Geografie). Lichens were used to estimate the age of monuments they were found on. One of the teachers was a lichen enthusiast. This teacher's college notes title was
Lichens don't lie...
I looked but didn't find reference to these college notes online. I did find an article with the same title on the site of the
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh:
"
Cleaner air? Lichens don't lie...27 May 2004
A rare lichen last seen in Edinburgh in 1797 has made its reappearance in the Garden at Inverleith. RBGE’s resident lichenologists Brian Coppins and Chris Ellis were examining the lichens growing on deciduous rhododendrons in the Azalea lawn when they discovered the gristle lichen, Ramalina fraxinea, attached to a rhododendron stem.
The gristle lichen has declined, sometimes to local extinction, in many parts of Britain due to high levels of sulphur dioxide air pollution prevailing since the Industrial Revolution. It is thought that rigorous and effective measures to reduce air pollution in the last decades have allowed lichens such as this to return to areas where they had previously died off.
The specimen found consisted of several rigid, strap-like lobes, the largest being 8cm long. Under ideal conditions, such as parkland trees in the north east of Scotland, this lichen can attain an impressive length of 30cm."

And another on the site of the French
Office of Science and Technology:
Lichens don't lieproof of nuclear site leakage
Who would you be more willing to believe, France's Atomic Energy Commission or a handful of rootless rock-dwellers? A report published in the Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry has sided with the latter, after several years studying lichen from the area surrounding the CEA's site near Dijon in northern Burgundy, where the CEA's military branch assembles and dismantles hydrogen bombs. The Valduc site has always claimed to be a model of nuclear cleanliness, but when the CEA in a fit of transparence established an independent association of local officials and scientists to verify these claims, the truth as told by local flora turned out to be other. The sample collection campaign was headed by an amateur mycologist who had won previous distinction by being the first to show – in 1986 – that radioactive air masses from Chernobyl had not magically stopped at the French border (as official utterance would have had it), basing his conclusions on spikes of radioactivity in mushrooms. Results from the lichen samples (having no roots, a lichen absorbs its water from the air, making it a particularly good litmus for atmospheric molecules) showed levels of tritium – the main isotope of hydrogen emitted at Valduc – to be 1000 times higher than normal in the immediate surroundings of the site, 100 times greater four kilometers away in the direction of the prevailing wind, and 10 times greater at 40 kilometers from the site. In response to CEA efforts to typify the local lichen as especially tritium-hungry, an independent group of mycologists carried out similar studies in other nuclear sites, like La Haye, with similar results. One final aspect of the watchdog findings, which requires substantiation, is the results from transplanting Valduc area lichen to non-nuclear regions; the mycologists found that the plant loses half its radioactivity in a year. Working backwards this would put Valduc tritium concentrations twenty years ago at exorbitant levels. (Libération, December 3, p11, Nicolas Chevassus-au-Louis)"
I rarely check my gmail and then when I do there's usually something surprising. This is one incoming:
Dear Frans --
I'm researching a possible documentary on the dangers to the mixed mesophytic forest along the Cumberland Plateau in the USA, especially in the state of Tennessee, home of the Tennessee Valley Authority and its involvement in the nuclear fuel and bomb cycles.
I noticed on your blog the posts "Lichens don't lie," particularly the one about Chernobyl fallout. I've also recently posted the following on an anti-DU list serve where arguments that fungi clean up nuclear contamination were sharply disputed:
"Fungi and alga intertwine to form lichens, which absorb strontium 90 and cesium 137 from the air -- lichens ingested by wildlife move into the food chain ... I'm citing "The Firecracker Boys: H-Bombs, Inupiat Eskimos, and the Roots of the Environmental Movement" (mainly about Edward Teller's effort to nuke a harbor at Point Hope in northwest Alaska while he was at Lawrence Radiology, part of LLNL, and the reaction to that) -- by Dan O'Neill -- this book was suggested by my nephew, who is an Alaskan wildlife biologist.
"Excerpts from pages 227-228:
"In the late 1950s and early 1960s, biologists were examining a puzzling phenomenon. Air currents in the stratosphere deposited fallout mostly in the Northern Hemisphere's Temperate Zone [where levels were] 10 times higher than levels measured on the ground in Arctic regions. But for some unknown reason, the level of strontium 90 showing up in Alaska caribou were many times higher than that in domestic animals in the lower states [25 micromicrocuries of Sr90 per gram of calcium in domestic animal bones vs. 100-200 strontium units in bones and antlers of caribou, and in the stomach, 200 units. vs. 1,264] ... Further, the caribou, and the Eskimos who ate the caribou, appeared to be higher in Sr90 than any other group in the world ...
"[The scientists, including Barry Commoner] focused on the unique biology of the caribou's major food, lichens ...
"... Lichens are the ideal organism to capture fallout ... lichens are rootless and derive their water and their mineral nutrition from the air ... When the caribou grazed on the lichens, their principal winter food, they gleaned the fallout from many acres and stored it into their tissues and bones. As Eskimos ate the caribou, they further concentrated into their bodies the radioactive strontium and cesium that were dispersed over miles of tundra ... and because Eskimo villages such as Point Hope might consume 100,000 pounds of caribou meat annually, the radioactive contamination was amplified at each successive level of the food chain ..."
I'm not sure where to take this, but it seems evident that one of the key clues to the presence of nuclear contamination of forests (including the Pletkau effect) would be lichens -- contamination from any aspect of the nuclear fuel and weapons cycles -- Perhaps you have thoughts this way, or suggestions on directions.
Below is me, our web site, and the link to opening scenes from a just-completed film, "Contaminated Forever." There's also a "who we are" link on the home page of Wild Clearing.
Best,
Wes Rehberg
Wes Rehberg
Wild Clearing
From the Clearing blog ...
skype: wildclearing